Division II May Soon Join Division I with Age-Based Eligibility—Could It Reshape College Recruiting?

The NCAA’s move toward an age-based eligibility model continues to gain momentum, with Division II leadership now recommending emergency legislation that would align its rules with the new Division I framework. If approved, Division II athletes would receive a five-year eligibility window beginning either with their first full-time college enrollment or the academic year following their 19th birthday—whichever comes first. The proposal is designed to simplify a rulebook that has become increasingly dependent on waivers, exceptions, and complicated eligibility calculations.

At Student-Athlete Advisors, we believe simplifying the eligibility rules is a positive step. The previous system had become so difficult to understand that even experienced coaches and compliance staff often struggled to interpret it consistently. Clearer, more predictable rules are better for student-athletes, families, coaches, and compliance offices alike. At the same time, there is another consequence families should be watching closely. As more Division I—and potentially Division II—athletes remain on rosters for a fifth year, there will naturally be fewer roster spots opening each recruiting cycle. That increased competition may lead more talented student-athletes to seriously consider Division III programs, where they can still find outstanding coaching, meaningful competition, and an educational experience that often aligns well with their long-term goals.

For years, we’ve encouraged families to view Division III as much more than a “backup plan.” If this legislation is adopted, we believe we’ll see even more student-athletes discover what Division III has always offered: the opportunity to compete at a high level while prioritizing academics, personal growth, and the full college experience. In many cases, that combination can be a better long-term fit than waiting for a limited roster spot at a higher division. We wouldn’t be surprised if this accelerates the already-growing trend of highly accomplished recruits choosing Division III—not because they couldn’t play elsewhere, but because the opportunity, timing, and overall fit simply make more sense.